Upcoming Events

Union Social31351413_10155211821490940_8525777856591036416_o

Friday 4th May, 5-8 p.m., The Wee Red Bar, Edinburgh College of Art

Take a break from marking essays and recreate the camaraderie of the picket line (but without the snow) with union members (UCU, EIS, Unison and Unite all welcome – ECA and beyond), non-members and students for an end-of-year celebration of a successful semester’s campaigning.

Come and meet local representatives, fellow students and staff across departments, catch up and enjoy some music and some Friday early evening drinks. It’s a great opportunity to discuss what is important to you in your workplace or place of study, whether that be workplace casualisation or the pensions dispute.

Lastly, this is a potluck which means if you get the chance bring and share some finger food and bar snack if you can!

UCU Day of Action Against Workplace Racism: Decolonising Education (rescheduled)

31301451_607237236286234_781531662432337920_oTuesday 8 May, 4-5 p.m., in 50 George Square, Project Room 1.06

This event was initially planned as part of the University and College Union’s (UCU) national day of action against workplace racism in February, but had to be postponed due to the snowstorm. While the snow stopped us then, we are going ahead with the event now – because anti-racism matters not just one day a year!

In this event on the theme of Decolonising Education we will discuss how to organise for a truly inclusive education. We have four fantastic panellists lined up, who will share their experiences and lead discussion:

  • Radhika Govinda, Lecturer in Sociology (University of Edinburgh)
  • Diljeet Bhachu, PhD researcher in Music (University of Edinburgh)
  • Diva Mukherji, co-founder of LiberatEd and EUSA VP Education (Edinburgh University Student Association)
  • Rianna Walcott, PhD researcher in English Literature (King’s College) and co-founder of Project Myopia

The event will consist of introductions by the panellists on what decolonising education means for them, and then we will open up discussion to other participants.

Everyone is welcome – students, staff, members and not-yet-members of the union – so please join us!

Further Information

 

 

 

Advertisements

Thanks to the Student Occupation

28701133_127755248058387_6722297334269126907_oThe student occupation of the Gordon Aikman lecture theatre in George Square ended last Tuesday on the 6 week anniversary of it beginning.  It has been a real inspiration and, at our branch committee meeting yesterday evening, we agreed that it was fitting to mark the occasion and to thank all those involved for what has been achieved and for the foundations that have been created on which we all can build.

First of all, this was an expression of practical solidarity with our dispute, giving both visible and physical support for staff on strike.  Secondly, it correctly situated the dispute within the context of a wider malaise within HE, raising questions around the marketisation of the sector, the commodification of education and essentially challenging the prevailing orthodoxy about what a university should be.

Linking staff and student issues together was a backdrop to a forum where, through teach-outs, workshops and other events, a whole range of topics were discussed both conceptually and from a practical perspective.  This is both the legacy of the occupation and the mission for what comes next.

The occupation itself maybe over but the conversation continues.  The struggle for a democratic university continues.  Staff and students, shoulder to shoulder, continues.  Foundations have been laid and we will build on them together.  We are the University.

UCU Members on Visas

Communication from UCU HQ

Dear all

As you know, the union took legal advice prior to the USS strike based on the fourteen days period of action. Our advice to members is at question 32, in the frequently asked questions (FAQs) here.

We also wrote to the home secretary on 15 March to express our disquiet at the effect that the management of unauthorised absence had on the fundamental right to strike.

Our parliamentary team have been strongly pressing the minister for a response but despite assurances none has yet been forthcoming.

Once we have that response we will be able to consider whether a legal challenge to this would be effective.

In order to protect members in the meantime we are asking branches to adopt the following position until further notice in any further strike action:

‘The support for strike action from staff on visas has been substantial despite the threatening and intimidatory atmosphere created by the government’s immigration and visa policy. We recognise that further strike action beyond the first fourteen days of action may heighten the risk of staff being reported for periods of unauthorised absence. Staff in this position should therefore be granted a local exemption to future USS strike action and – where it attracts a punitive penalty – the action short of a strike (ASOS). Our expectation is that staff exempted in this way will make an appropriate donation to the strike fund in lieu of any future action. We welcome national UCU’s campaign to exempt the taking of industrial action from the definition of unauthorised absences in order to protect the fundamental right to withdraw one’s labour.’

Please note that our understanding is that there is currently a statutory obligation on employers to report strike action as an unauthorised absence. Our advice is that employers – even those who are sympathetic on the issue – have little room for manoeuvre, hence the importance of the political campaign. If reassurances are received from the home office we will amend our advice accordingly.

Please email me with any queries. Also please note that we will be closing the online form for replacement e-ballot requests at 2pm today in order to give the team sufficient time to check and process requests.

Best wishes

Matt Waddup
UCU national head of policy and campaigns

Vote No in Brief(s)

ussbriefsIn today’s piece on why we recommend a ‘No’ vote in the ballot, we highlight three essential pieces of reading from the USS Briefs site.

The UUK offer: context and analysis

uukoIn this article, Deepa Govindarajan Driver, University of Reading and Kurt Mills, University of Dundee deconstruct the offer, summarise the case against it under four main headings. This article is also well-linked to a number of other USS Briefs for those who want to explore the arguments in more details.

Debunking Sally Hunt’s email

dsheThis article sees Jo Grady, University of Sheffield, Claire Marris, City, University of London, and Jess Meacham, University of Sheffield examine the context of the text of the email that accompanied the ballot link. They present the case for it containing both misrepresentations and factual inaccuracies.

Why which way to vote on the latest UUK proposal should be an easy decision

wwtvSam Marsh, University of Sheffield, argues that the current wording offers no guarantees, and explains the thought processes that has led him to come to an easy decision.

 

Useful Links

  • Ballot email not received or lost – request a replacement
  • USS Briefs – a set of papers by academics on the many dimensions of the USS pensions dispute, written in response to the UUK proposal of 23rd March 2018
  • USS Materials – a comprehensive list of links to articles about the dispute, arranged chronologically and categorised by type.
  • Follow the latest discussion on Twitter via hashtags #USSStrike and #RejectUUKDeal

Why Vote No?

ruukd

Five Points in Support of a ‘No’ Vote

  1.  The UUK proposal is a big step forward from the 23rd January decision. Our industrial action stopped the employers imposing a Defined Contributions scheme and they have begun talking about a potential solution. But this deeply ambiguous proposal commits them to nothing – it is effectively an agenda for a series of meetings, not an offer.
  2.  UUK pledge “a pension broadly comparable with current arrangements”. The letter of clarification from UUK’s chief executive says it “does not intend to return to the January JNC proposal to consult on moving to a DC scheme”. But these vague statements, which UCU negotiators had no opportunity to question, carry no guarantees. Indeed, they are the same phrases that we’ve heard before, in relation to the January proposal and the March proposal.
  3. UUK are on the defensive and can be forced to concede more. To accept the current proposal as it stands would concede our advantage, allowing them to regroup and return to attack us again at a later date.
  4.  We have seen two substantial degradations of our pension scheme in the last decade. There are many in the union who want to demand a commitment of no further detrimental change (a ’no detriment clause’) for the current valuation round (i.e. until 2022). This would enable a period of stability that would benefit employers, staff and students. Other commitments short of such a clause are also potentially achievable. So if you favour a ‘revise and resubmit’ position, you should also vote no.
  5.  We need clear timescales for the expert panel. The panel should report by a specified date, early enough to influence the outcome of the current valuation. It should then discuss the underlying methodology and form recommendations on how it sees the future of valuing USS, in time to influence the 2020 valuation at the latest.

‘Revise and Resubmit’ and ‘No Detriment’

With so much information flying about, we’ve been asked to further clarify the difference between the ‘no detriment’ position and the ‘revise and resubmit’ position.
  • Both positions hold that the UUK proposal is a good start, but not enough.
  • Both positions hold that the UCU negotiators should be involved in producing a revised, clarified offer.
  • Those who support the ‘no detriment’ position want to see the inclusion of a clause that says there would be no detrimental changes to our pensions (either increases to member contributions or reductions to benefits) before 2022 when the next valuation would take effect.  It’s important to realise that it is not a ‘no detriment forever’ position.
  • Some of those who favour a ‘revise and resubmit’ position want clarification of terms such as “broadly comparable” and “meaningful element of DB” effective until 2022, and would not rule out small but limited increases in member contributions or reductions in benefits.
  • Both positions require a no vote.

Further information on the “no detriment” position

Flowchart of Potential Outcomes

This is a graphic map posted by Adam Errington on Twtter, illustrating some of the possible outcomes of both a yes and no vote.
ae
Click on image for larger one

View original Twitter post

Useful Links

  • Ballot email not received or lost – request a replacement
  • USS Briefs – a set of papers by academics on the many dimensions of the USS pensions dispute, written in response to the UUK proposal of 23rd March 2018
  • Follow the latest discussion on Twitter via hashtags #USSStrike and #RejectUUKDeal

 

Motion Passed: Vote No, Call HE Sector Conference

voteAt EGMs held both in the central campus and at Kings Buildings yesterday (5th April), both resolutions in the motion below were passed.  There was a healthy debate at both which could have gone on well beyond the time available.

  • Firstly, the branch now commits itself to campaigning for a ‘No’ vote in the current ballot but fully recognises and remains sensitive to other opinions expressed.
  • Secondly, we call for the convening, at the earliest possible opportunity, of an HE Sector Conference within UCU, to debate strategy around the USS dispute.

 

Motion

Proposer: Grant Buttars

Seconder: Shereen Benjamin

This branch notes:

  1. the decision by the majority of UCU’s Higher Education Committee to ballot UCU members on the proposal from UUK;
  2. that a majority of UCU branches meeting on 25 and 26 March wanted to ‘Revise and Resubmit’ this proposal and many took a clear position of ‘No Detriment;
  3. employers such as Liverpool University and the Open University are already announcing redundancies

We believe that:

  1. accepting the proposal as it stands will demobilise our highly-successful campaign of strike action at a point when we are making serious gains;
  2. seeking further clarification and assurances on the ambiguities presented by the proposal does not necessarily imply taking a ‘No Detriment’ position;
  3. we need to maintain maximum momentum to defend Defined Benefit pensions, pay and jobs.

We therefore resolve:

  1. that the branch will campaign to urge a ‘No’ vote in the ballot;
  2. to call for an emergency Higher Education Sector Conference to debate strategy around the USS dispute.

For reference

Extract from UCU rule book https://www.ucu.org.uk/ucurules

16.11 Special meetings of National Congress or the Sector Conferences shall be convened, by giving at least three working weeks’ notice, when it is so resolved by the National Executive Committee or in the case of the Sector Conferences, the relevant Sector Committee, or following receipt of a requisition from quorate general meetings in 20 branches/Local Associations from separate institutions across the Union, or for Sector Conferences, in the Sector, or bearing the identifiable signatures of not less than one tenth of the members of the Union. Such resolution or requisition shall specify the intended business, and only that business may be transacted at the special meeting.

16.12 Requisitioned special meetings shall take place within five working weeks of receipt of the requisition by the General Secretary. Where branches/local associations have passed motions requisitioning a meeting, but the total is not yet deemed sufficient to trigger the requisition, up-to-date information regarding progress of the requisition, including the particulars of its business and the number and names of branches/Local Associations deemed to have passed the appropriate requisition motion, will be available to all members on request.

Motion to Congress

Passed at an Emergency General Meeting today, the following motion will go to UCU Scotland Congress on Friday.

This branch notes:

  1. That the evidence base for the proposed cuts to USS has been widely discredited and has been rejected by a majority of University leaders;
  2. The strength of the opposition to the proposed settlement (12/3/2018) across the UK.

This branch believes that it is illogical as well as detrimental to members to pursue changes to USS in the absence of a credible evidence base.

This branch calls on UCU Scotland to:

  1. Support branches in working with students and mobilising for escalation of the dispute, including further strike action;
  2. Work with national leadership to demand retention of the USS status quo pending a further valuation in which members can have confidence;
  3. Work with MSPs to use their influence with university leaders to bring UUK back to the negotiating table; and,
  4. Seek out and pursue fund-raising opportunities to support the Fighting Fund/local hardship funds